Figures in Original article by VITO LEANZA*, STEFANO DATI**, GIOVANNI PISAPIA
CIOFFI***, MANUELA ACCARDI*
(*) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catania
University (Italy)
(**) Casilino Hospital, Urogynaecology Unit, Rome (Italy)
(***) Obstetrics and Gynaecology Unit, Ospedale Battipaglia Salerno
(Table 1)
GROUPS |
MODE OF DELIVERY |
SATISFACTION
AGREE / DISAGREE |
χ2 |
p VALUE |
A : 5 years
12% (n°=1215) |
VD: 70.9% (861)
CS: 29.1% (354) |
92.9%(800) / 7.1%(61)
90.1%(319) / 9.9%(35) |
2.34 |
0.12645 NS |
B: 5-20 years
36% (n°=3645) |
VD: 78% (2843)
CS: 22% (802) |
84.9%(2416) / 15.1%(427)
89%(714) / 11%(88) |
8.11 |
0.00439 |
C: >20 years
52% (n°=5265) |
VD: 85% (4475)
CS: 15% (790) |
77%(3446) / 23%(1029)
92%(727) / 8%(63) |
91.23 |
0.0001 |
|
Table 1. – Statistical evaluation and satisfaction
reports among the three groups of patients comparing vaginal delivery
(VD) versus caesarean section (CS).
|