Pelviperineology

Tables in Original article by
ALEKSANDRA STANKIEWICZ (*) - ANDRZEJ P. WIECZOREK (*) - MAGDALENA M.WOZNIAK (*)
MICHAL BOGUSIEWICZ (**), KONRAD FUTYMA (**), TOMASZ RECHBERGER (**) -
GIULIO A. SANTORO (***)

Comparison of accuracy of functional measurements of the urethra in transperineal vs. endovaginal ultrasound in incontinent women

(*) Pediatric Radiology Department, Children’s Hospital, Medical University of Lublin, ul Chodzki 2, 20-093 Lublin - Poland
(**) 2nd Gynecology Department, Teaching Hospital, Medical University of Lublin, ul.Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090 Lublin - Poland
(***) 3rd Division of General Surgery, Regional Hospital, Treviso - Italy Images

reproduction prohibited without permission of Authors.

(Table 1)

Urethral length at rest Urethral length at Valsalva Urethral length at squeezing BSD at rest BSD at Valsalva BSD at squeezing TPUS M: 32,5 mm SD: 2,87 mm 30,1 mm 2,5 mm 33,3 mm 3,7 mm 18,9 mm 5,1mm 6,2 mm 11,4 mm 19,9 mm 6,78 mm EVUS M: 32,6 mm SD: 3,49 mm 29,7 mm 3,5 mm 33,1 mm 3,3 mm 18,9 mm 2,8 mm 6,3 mm 8,1 mm 21,1 mm 5,7 mm

Table 1. – Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of the urethral length and BSD obtained by TPUS and EVUS in the group of 10 patients with only stress urinary incontinence.

(Table. 2 )

Urethral length at rest Urethral length at Valsalva Urethral length at squeezing BSD at rest BSD at Valsalva BSD at squeezing TPUS M: 34,7 mm SD: 3,76 mm 30,1 mm 2,5 mm 33,3 mm 3,7 mm 18,9 mm 5,1mm 6,2 mm 11,4 mm 19,9 mm 6,78 mm EVUS M: 32,6 mm SD: 3,49 mm 29,7 mm 3,5 mm 33,1 mm 3,3 mm 18,9 mm 2,8 mm 6,3 mm 8,1 mm 21,1 mm 5,7 mm

Table 2. – Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of the urethral length and BSD obtained by TPUS and EVUS in the group of 15 patients with stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse.