Tables in Original article by ANDRZEJ PAWEL WIECZOREK - MAGDALENA MARIA WOZNIAK
- ALEKSANDRA STANKIEWICZ
(1) - MICHAL BOGUSIEWICZ - TOMASZ RECHBERGER
(2) - GIULIO ANIELLO SANTORO
(3) - JAKOB SCHOLBACH
(4)
(1) Department of Pediatric Radiology, Children’s Hospital, Skubiszewski Medical University of Lublin, ul. Chodzki 2, Lublin, Poland
(2) 2nd Department of Gynecology, Skubiszewski Medical University of Lublin, ul. Jaczewskiego 8, Lublin, Poland
(3) 3rd Division of Surgery, Pelvic Floor Unit, Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
(4) Chameleon Software, Kunzenweg 2b, Freiburg, Germany
Images reproduction prohibited without permission of Authors.
(Fig 1)
| |
Fig 1a, b. – Vascular pattern of the urethra obtained in color-doppler mode using the linear transverse array of the transducer.
|
(Fig 2)
|
Fig 2. – a) Analysis of intensity of urethral vascularity with the use of PixelFlux software. Region of interest set at the level of intramural part of urethra.
Sagittal plane; b) Analysis of intensity of urethral vascularity with the use of PixelFlux software. Region of interest set at the level of midurethra. Sagittal
plane; c) Analysis of intensity of urethral vascularity with the use of PixelFlux software. Region of interest set at the level of distal part of urethra.
Sagittal plane.
|
(Fig 3)
|
Fig 3. – a) Analysis of intensity of urethral vascularity with the use of PixelFlux software. Region of interest set at the outer ring of urethra (rhabdosphincter).
Axial plane; b) Analysis of intensity of urethral vascularity with the use of PixelFlux software. Region of interest set at the inner ring of
urethra (circular smooth muscle, longitudinal smooth muscle and submucosa). Axial plane.
|