Home Page Home Article Read Close close

Tables in Original article by ULRIKE SATZINGER (*) - WOLFGANG FEIL (**) - KARL GLASER (***)

Recto Anal Repair (RAR): a viable new treatment option for high-grade hemorrhoids.
One year results of a prospective study


(*) Krankenhaus St. Josef, Vienna, (**) Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Vienna, (***) Wilhelminenspital, Vienna

Tables reproduction prohibited without permission of Authors.

(Table 1)

Female n = 36 (43 %)
Male n = 47 (57 %)

Table 1. – Sex of patients.


Close close


(Table 2)

Grade III n = 75 (90 %)
Grade IV n = 8 (10%)

Table 2. – Goligher classification of hemorrhoids.


Close close

(Table 3)

General n = 31 (37 %)
Spinal n = 52 (63 %)

Table 3. – Anaesthesia.


Close close

(Table 4)

 

GRADE III

GRADE IV

3

5

1
4

4

2
5

12

1
6

18

2
7

20

1
8

7

1
9

4

0
≥10

5

0

Table 4. – Number of ligations.


Close close

(Table 5)

 

GRADE III

GRADE IV

1

5

0
2

7

0
3

36

2
4

18

4
≥5

9

2

Table 5. – Number of mucopexies.


Close close

(Table 6)

 

n.

follow-up
hemorrhoidal
symptoms
present
persistent
bleeding

persistent
pruritus ani

persistent
pain

fecal
urgency
persistent
prolapse
further
surgeries
(not peri-operative)
stapled hemorroidectomy [LIT]

174

7-14 months (median)

22,4%

14,9%

8,0%

8,7%

10,2%

10,2%

7,3%
conventional surgery [LIT]

188

7-14 months (median)

14,1%

14,1%

14,1%

10,4%

10,7%

2,2%

3,2%
RAR: Theodoropoulos [LIT]

37

15 months (average)

4,0%

1,4%

no data

no data

no data

2,2%

2,7%
RAR: Zagryadskiy [LIT]

85

10 months (average)

9,4%

3,5%

0,0%

0,0%

0,0%

1,2%

no data

RAR: Our series[LIT]

44

15 months (minimum)

no data

11,4%

4,6%

no data

0,0%

11,4%

2,3%

 

Table 6. – Comparison of results from different treatment options for high-grade hemorrhoids.


Close close

www.cheiron.com