Original article Kim M. Haest (*) - Tom H. Hasaart (*) - Ilknur Sanli (*) - Ed T. Gondrie (**) Martin G. Bergmans (***)
(*) Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
(**) Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maasland Hospital, Sittard, The Netherlands
(***) Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laurentius Hospital, Roermond, The Netherland
descensus cervix/ vaginal apex |
cystocele |
rectocele enterocele |
cystocele recto/enterocele |
no significant cysto/rectocele |
total |
|
C E R V I X |
grade 1 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
grade 2 |
10 |
19 |
11 |
0 |
40 |
|
grade 3 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
6 |
|
grade 4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
15 |
17 |
|
vault prolapse grade 3 or 4 |
39 |
33 |
8 |
4 |
84 |
|
TABLE 2. – Tape used in posterior IVS procedure.
| Nylon Tape | 49 patients |
| Multifilament polypropylene tape | 78 patients |
| Apical failure | 14 patients (11.67%) |
| Cystocoele | 27 patients (22.5%) |
| Rectal trauma | 2 patients (1.6 %) |
| Pudendal or inferior haemorrhoidal artery damage | 0 patients |
| Nerve injury | 0 patients |
| Ischiorectal abscess nylon tape | 0 patients |
| Mesh extrusion nylon tape at 2 years | 5 patients (10%) |
| Mesh extrusion nylon tape at 6 years | 5 patients (10%) |
| Ischiorectal abscess multifilament polypropylene tape | 3 patients |
| Mesh extrusion multifilament polypropylenetape at 2 years | 2 patients (3%) |
| Mesh extrusion multifilament polypropylene tape at 6 years | 8 patients (11%) |
| Clinical Infection of prosthesis | 17 patients (14%) |
| Clinical tape rejection | 9 patients (7.5%) |
| Post operative haematoma | 5 patients (4%) |
| Blood transfusion | 0 patients |